Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)小小研究心得

In General   June 2, 2006 - 11:00 am

wikipedia上的解釋

SaaS 有兩種

-ASP (application service provider)
-Software on Demand

*前者:client買好軟體(先付軟體費給isv) 然後拿去給 hosting provider 放上線(付hosting 跟 bandwidth 錢)

*後者:isv開發好軟體,通常是一對多的架構,同時提供 使用權 與 hosting 服務,因此client付費給同一個人。

ASP versus SaaS

來自 wikipedia 的解釋

The reason for moving away from the term ASP or Application service provider is that the ASP generation was merely traditional client-server applications with HTML frontends added as an afterthought. These applications were hosted by third-parties who ordinarily did not have application expertise, but were managed servers. Because the applications were not written as net-native applications, performance was poor and application updates were no better than self managed applications. By comparison, current net-native SaaS applications or independent portions are updated regularly, many daily.

SaaS links

Breeze
yap, Breeze也是 SaaS的一種,它完全符合上述對 SaaS 型態的描述,在合併後的adobe內甚至有一個事業群是專門在經營這塊,目前 breeze 等hosted software service是 Sean Corfield 在掌管。

Basecamp
一個小型專案管理系統,php/mysql架構,風評不錯,但顯然可改進空間頗多。

Salesforce
傳統老牌名店,最近規模越長越大也開始出現模組化架構,可以讓3rd party自已寫app然後掛進去那個platform 販售,頗有從 SaaS 變型為 platform channel 的架勢。

by admin

2 Comments

  • 1. Rita&hellip  |  June 2nd, 2006 at 11:31 am

    這種定義法好怪,
    那現在很流行的那種網路開店算哪一種?
    廠商也同時提供開店軟體和Server及頻寬,
    這應該算SaaS,
    可是在六年前,ASP被炒得很熱時的方案不就跟這個SaaS提的差不多?

  • 2. jeremy&hellip  |  June 2nd, 2006 at 11:47 am

    Saas = ASP || on-demand software

    但說真的我也覺得這種解釋或分類方法不是很理想,至少沒達到 mutually exclusive 的程度。

    如果根據那個 vs 段落的說法,ASP是指 hosting provider本身不是軟體開發商,例如一家ISP提供 osCommerce, pLog 等服務讓人申請,但這家ISP本身不開發/修改/增加軟體功能,就算做 ASP。

    而SaaS則是比較像 wordpress.com,這家公司自已研發軟體(wordpress)也同時提供服務(wordpress.com),照他的解釋,這是優於傳統 ASP的地方。

    有趣的是我一個個看過wiki上的link,結果發現很多公司現在都說自已是 on-demand software provider,而不再自稱是 ASP了,呵,風水輪流轉呀~

Trackback this post

mobile phone